Tuesday, June 08, 2010

Streamlining the gene pool through religion

Here is a fascinating study that shows how Jewish populations end up sharing a similar genetic background. From New Scientist:

Jewish populations around the world share more than traditions and laws – they also have a common genetic background. That is the conclusion of the most comprehensive genetic study yet aimed at tracing the ancestry of Jewish people.

In a study of over 200 Jews from cities in three different countries, researchers found that all of them descended from a founding community that lived 2500 years ago in Mesopotamia.

...

The main reason that Jews continue to form a distinct genetic group, despite their wide dispersal is the exclusivity of the Jewish religion and the tight restrictions it imposes on marriage to those outside the Jewish faith.

Ostrer's colleague Gil Atzmon of Albert Einstein College of Medicine at Yeshiva University in New York says that the religious traditions and laws shared by practising Jews around the world, and their isolation from their non-Jewish neighbours, means that Jews share many more genomic segments with each other than they do with non-Jewish people.

The study is based on the DNA analysis of Jews in several countries and is a good demonstration of the power of cultural studies through DNA:

Atzmon and his colleagues studied the DNA of 237 Jews from New York, Seattle, Athens and Rome, representing Ashkenazi, Turkish, Greek, Italian, Syrian, Iranian and Iraqi groups. They searched for genetic similarities among these populations, and compared them with the DNA of 418 non-Jews.

The study compared 2 million distinct DNA markers known as SNPs spread across the entire genome. That's four times the number of markers used in previous studies. "We are the first to analyse genome-wide differences," says Atzmon.

Atzmon's team found that the SNP markers in genetic segments of 3 million DNA letters or longer were 10 times more likely to be identical among Jews than non-Jews.

And here is a fascinating bit about the tracing of history as well as the benefits of such a study:

The genetic tree shows that between 100 and 150 generations ago – the equivalent of 2500 years – the founder population split in two, with half the Jews being dispersed into Europe and North Africa, the other half remaining in the Middle East.

This corresponds with accounts of the expulsion of the Jews into exile in 587 BC by the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar.

The genetic analysis shows that amongst modern Jews, the populations that are most genetically similar are those originating from Iraq and Iran. The rest share much more of their DNA with non-Jewish Europeans and North Africans, which may be why many Jews whose recent ancestors lived in Europe or Syria have blond hair or blue eyes.

The team found genetic traces of a period of intense conversion to Judaism during the time of the Roman Empire, when up to 10 per cent of citizens were Jewish. Among modern non-Jewish Europeans, Italians, Sardinians and the French are most closely genetically similar to modern Jews, the team found.

Atzmon says that the analysis could bring medical benefits by helping to identify genetic markers for diseases common in Jewish communities breast cancer, prostate cancer and the inherited metabolic condition, Tay-Sachs disease, which kills in infanthood.

You can access the full article with a very looong title here: Abraham's Children in the Genome Era: Major Jewish Diaspora Populations Comprise Distinct Genetic Clusters with Shared Middle Eastern Ancestry.

1 comment:

Hermann said...

I am amazed the study is considered a breakthrough...

- 200 participants in three clusters out of some 80.
- No blank participants were included. These would be, for a proper stochastic evaluation from the locale of where the 247. A comparison with 'non-Jews' is meaningless due to social factors attending the pattern of Jewish lives since the Babylonian expulsion.
- More importantly: to prove that Jews are a distinct racial group one would need to include in the ‘study’ Arabs from the Middle East and North Africa - not only Jews.

- The study astutely ignored Ashkenazim from the US. There, the variation would probably be staggering and stretches for at least five generations.

- The study attempts to prove the 'expulsion' by the Babylonians. We have no record, apart that of the single Jewish 'historian' Josephus Flavius, who is now completely discredited. What we do have is ample evidence in Babylonian, Assyrian, and above all Egyptian documents, several references to the Hebrews being "Semi-Nomadic" tribes.

This suggests that the Koestler's theory that the Jews roamed around even beyond the Fertile Crescent, to the periphery of Central Asia seems to be partly and inadvertently validated by the 'study.' Only that the immigration was not from Palestine to Europe, but from Central Asia to Europe. Which would require an investigation whether the Hebrews as semi-nomadic ('Habiru' in Egyptian hieroglyphs) moved about and settled wherever they could feed themselves.

Today some Jewish Khazars in the boarders of Central Asia still exist. Many were converted to Islam but the rest remained Jewish. How would that figure if the 'study' included them?

The stories and fables of the Hebrews have no basis in archaeology - so far. No one can assert with any material evidence the spread of the Kingdoms of Israel and Judea, the stories about David and Solomon, and other fables that include, according to US and Israeli historians the Exodus itself. It all existed in the minds of the story tellers...

The challenge remains: There is not a single evidence to any of these fables: one, a small one, a tiny one!

This does not make the Jews bad or good. They are no better or worse than other human beings, Muslims, Christians, Buddhists, and the rest. This, however, makes the Zionists, who falsify history very bad, and their scientists even worse.

This is a political study aimed at promoting specific political ideals - but then, it does come from a religious school so no surprise there! The flaws are detectable by a 2nd year student in experimental design.