"Honey is sweet because we like it, not we like it because it is sweet." This is just equivocation -- a play on words. What does he mean by sweet? He doesn't define his terms.But this play on words is no different from the question "if a tree falls in the woods with no one around, does it make a sound?" Per Dennett's reasoning, "the tree makes a sound because we hear it, not we hear it because it makes a sound."Silly, of course. The tree causes the air to vibrate whether or not we're there to hear it. And glucose is chemically the same whether or not we're there to taste it.In fact, if you tell me what ingredients go into a cake, I can tell you whether it's sweet or not without tasting it -- and test my prediction by tasting it. And be right.Now he gets even more absurd when he tries to compare "sexy and funny" with design arguments, because they are fundamentally different. Funny and sexy are mere personal preferences, while design arguments rest on probabilistic interpretations. In other words, he equates "I like hot dogs" to "I believe the accused killed the victim because X, Y, and Z evidence supports that conclusion." The first is based on personal feelings detached from evidence; the second (while fallible) is based on an interpretation of the evidence at least.In the end, this video doesn't impress anyone who hasn't already drunk the kool aid. Sorry man.
cheap wedding gowns, discount bridal gowns,China wedding dresses,discount designer wedding dresses,China wedding online store,plus size wedding dresses,cheap informal wedding dresses,junior bridesmaid dresses,cheap bridesmaid dresses,maternity bridesmaid dresses,discount flower girl gowns,cheap prom dresses,party dresses,evening dresses,mother of the bride dresses,special occasion dresses,cheap quinceanera dresses,hot red wedding dresses
Post a Comment