tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38085367.post6106561972398488047..comments2024-03-19T09:06:21.507-04:00Comments on Irtiqa: Inanity square: Denyse O'Leary on Harun YahyaSalman Hameedhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04327330113822656571noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38085367.post-9619049216139757572010-03-30T16:48:20.218-04:002010-03-30T16:48:20.218-04:00"Someone please call Denyse O'Leary. I..."Someone please call Denyse O'Leary. I've heard she is very good in sorting out issues that have little connection to the real world."<br /><br /><br />You got that right. She's as out of it as Adnan Oktar and his cronies (this means you Jamshed Moidu).<br /><br />Albert Tatlock;)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38085367.post-12594388551840091822009-05-19T00:35:00.000-04:002009-05-19T00:35:00.000-04:00Harun yahya's intellectual works have defeated all...Harun yahya's intellectual works have defeated all the irreligious ideologies....so SALMAN dont waste your valuable time writting against Harun Yahya.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16973858391178991348noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38085367.post-56464057917162212602009-05-17T08:54:00.000-04:002009-05-17T08:54:00.000-04:00"The disagreement between Oktar and O'Leary should..."The disagreement between Oktar and O'Leary should have been clear to her from before they actually met. Then, it would seem that some (e.g. O'Leary, Johnson) thinks that any united front against evolution is a good one. Either that, or she is as thick as I suspect."<br /><br />I think its a combination of both. But a united front argument could still have been made by O'Leary without finding Yahya's book "the most succinct and comprehensive of the critiques of overblown claims for Darwinian evolution that I have ever read." If there was ever any doubt, this truly exposes her intellectual caliber. <br /><br />Thanks for the link to the Boston Review article.Salman Hameedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04327330113822656571noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38085367.post-63478521070358369992009-05-17T07:50:00.000-04:002009-05-17T07:50:00.000-04:00Freemasons, using the same logic, maintain in thei...<I>Freemasons, using the same logic, maintain in their writings that a "total power" or "a consciousness" directs the universe, but what they are referring to is definitely not Allah (Allah forbid).</I><BR><BR>Ridiculous<BR><BR>Next time, try doing a little research.FreemasonTruthnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38085367.post-65322906667433194352009-05-17T01:13:00.000-04:002009-05-17T01:13:00.000-04:00This reminds me of H. Allen Orr in Boston Review:
...This reminds me of H. Allen Orr in <A HREF="http://www.bostonreview.net/BR22.1/orr.html" REL="nofollow">Boston Review</A>:<br /><br /><I>All this is obvious. What is less obvious is that these new-wave anti-evolutionists disagree among themselves on just about everything. They don't go out of their way to broadcast this fact, but take a look: Behe thinks the primordial cell was designed, but that old-fashioned evolution took over from there, producing all the species we now see. But Johnson questions almost all evolution, including common descent and the fossil record that Behe trusts. Behe thinks the data point to an intelligent Designer, while Berlinski claims he's no creationist, he merely questions the sufficiency of Darwinism. Similarly, Behe has no problem with natural selection, while Berlinski seems to have no problem with anything but natural selection.</I>The disagreement between Oktar and O'Leary should have been clear to her from before they actually met. Then, it would seem that some (e.g. O'Leary, Johnson) thinks that any united front against evolution is a good one. Either that, or she is as thick as I suspect.Bjørn Østmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08859177313382114917noreply@blogger.com