tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38085367.post2698453873813683173..comments2024-03-19T09:06:21.507-04:00Comments on Irtiqa: From your inner fish to the universe withinSalman Hameedhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04327330113822656571noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38085367.post-40415532979918259802013-01-11T10:38:22.180-05:002013-01-11T10:38:22.180-05:00Mr Hameed,
Casey Luskin usually refutes all of th...Mr Hameed,<br /><br />Casey Luskin usually refutes all of the half-decent and reasonable arguments that are (on those very rare occasions) presented by people like that Qu'ran desecrator who you admire so much. Indeed, please read the link I provided, you'll see that's exactly what he does.<br /><br />The fact that the atheist side is so rude and offensive, while the likes of Casey Luskin - who is like you and me, a believer in God - is reasonable and courteous is an indication that the atheist side is losing the argument.<br /><br />In any event, none of your links alter the fact that Shubin was wrong and Tiktaalik arrived 20 million years too late. Better informed evolutionists admit that much.<br /><br />Even if you believe the likes of Luskin is wrong about God's method of creation - which, as explained previously, is a minor technical point - you must surely agree with him that he is right about God, Morality and Afterlife. <br /><br />And Myers is dead wrong (and even supposing he was half-right about evolution isn't exactly a redeeming prospect).<br /><br />Can you explain why you seek alliances with God-hating atheists against your fellow believers, fellow muslims even?<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03617866335702689569noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38085367.post-83594112149772517362013-01-11T09:08:44.810-05:002013-01-11T09:08:44.810-05:00Ah - so you are a Disco Institute fan.
So here i...Ah - so you are a Disco Institute fan. <br /><br />So here is Loom on Luskin's earlier claims of Luskin (yes, Luskin has been making sensational claims for a while): <br />http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/07/14/746/#.UPAblLZUR_4<br /><br />and here is a more specific response to Luskin's 2010 claim (and yes, just because I disagree with Pharygula on religion doesn't mean that it does a poor job in addressing creationists* - especially on matters of biology):<br />http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/01/09/casey-luskin-embarrasses-himse/<br /><br />and here is the Sensuous Curmudgeon on this particular post of Luskin:<br />http://sensuouscurmudgeon.wordpress.com/2010/09/19/casey-luskin-vs-reality-the-thundering-climax/<br /><br />Creationists - defined here as those who believe that species have been created as is.Salman Hameedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04327330113822656571noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38085367.post-1271038963761063022013-01-11T08:09:49.367-05:002013-01-11T08:09:49.367-05:00You should definitely have mentioned the fact that...You should definitely have mentioned the fact that Tiktaalik came along 20 million years too late and so Shubin's prediction was wrong:<br /><br />http://www.evolutionnews.org/2010/09/evolutionary_biologists_are_un038261.htmlAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03617866335702689569noreply@blogger.com